MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

277 SynNotch-CAR T cells demonstrate potent anti-tumor efficacy in a preclinical immunocompetent mouse model for glioblastoma

2023· article· en· W4388048274 on OpenAlexaff
Senthilnath Lakshmanachetty, Milos Simic, Payal Watchmaker, Akane Yamamichi, Tiffany Chen, Su Phyu, Takahide Nejo, Chanelle Shepherd, Jason Duecker, Yuan Wang, Olga G. Troyanskaya, Lia Cardarelli, Sachdev S. Sidhu, Wendell A. Lim, Hideho Okada

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchGliomaImmunotherapyChimeric antigen receptorTumor microenvironmentFlow cytometryImmune systemEpidermal growth factor receptorAntigenCytotoxic T cellBrain tumorBiologyImmunologyMedicineReceptorPathologyInternal medicineIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor. Recent immunotherapy studies, including CAR T cells, have shown limited success in GBM due to multiple barriers, such as on-target off-tumor toxicity, the blood-brain barrier, and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). To overcome these challenges, we recently adopted a novel synthetic Notch ‘synNotch’ receptor system and developed innovative T cell (‘synNotch-CART’) circuits based on the ‘prime-and-kill’ strategy.<sup>1</sup> Here, we investigated the GBM-homing and efficacy of SynNotch-CAR T cells using a preclinical immunocompetent mouse model, which, similar to GBM patients, is poorly immunogenic and unresponsive to immune checkpoint blockade.<sup>2</sup> <h3>Methods</h3> Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification and overexpression occur in approximately 40–60% of GBM patients.<sup>3</sup> Therefore, we first expressed the extracellular domain of mouse EGFR in a syngeneic glioma cell line, SB28 (SB28-mEGFR). Next, we developed a novel synNotch-CAR (mBSYNC) circuit in which the brain-specific antigen, brevican (BCAN) primes the T cells to induce the expression of a CAR that recognizes and kills EGFR-positive cells (mBSYNC synNotch-CAR T cells). 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice bearing the SB28-mEGFR cells in the frontal lobe received a single intravenous infusion of mBSYNC synNotch-CAR or conventional CAR T cells with constitutive CAR expression on day 8 following the tumor inoculation. Trafficking of CAR T cells and host immune cells into the brains was evaluated using high-dimensional flow cytometry. <h3>Results</h3> Constitutive a-EGFR CAR and mBSYNC synNotch-CAR T cells mediated antigen-specific cytotoxicity against SB28-mEGFR cells <i>in vitro</i>. In an <i>in vivo</i> prospective study, on day 12 after T cell infusion, mBSYNC synNotch-CAR T cells demonstrated a higher persistence, increased infiltration of endogenous CD86<sup>+</sup> and MHC-II<sup>hi</sup> macrophages and decreased infiltration of CD206<sup>+</sup> macrophages into the GBM TME compared to either untransduced or constitutive a-EGFR CAR T-cells. Lastly<i>,</i> a single intravenous infusion of mBSYNC synNotch-CAR T cells significantly (p &lt; 0.01) prolonged the survival and completely eradicated the aggressive tumor in 3 of 10 mice bearing SB28-mEGFR gliomas. Conclusions mBSYNC synNotch-CAR T cells, but not conventional CAR T cells, effectively home into the brain TME, persist, and eliminate the tumor in an immunocompetent setting. The induced pro-inflammatory activity of endogenous myeloid cells could contribute to the anti-tumor efficacy mediated by synNotch-CAR T cells. Ongoing studies are aimed at the thorough characterization of tumor cells, host immune cells, and synNotch-CAR T cells in the brain TME. <h3>References</h3> Choe JH, Watchmaker PB, Simic MS, Gilbert RD, Li AW, Krasnow NA, Downey KM, Yu W, Carrera DA, Celli A, <i>et al.</i> SynNotch-CAR T cells overcome challenges of specificity, heterogeneity, and persistence in treating glioblastoma. <i>Sci Transl Med</i> 2021;<i>13</i>. 10.1126/scitranslmed.abe7378. Genoud V, Marinari E, Nikolaev SI, Castle JC, Bukur V, Dietrich PY, Okada H, Walker PR. Responsiveness to anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immune checkpoint blockade in SB28 and GL261 mouse glioma models. <i>Oncoimmunology</i> 2018;<i>7:</i>e1501137. 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1501137. Brennan CW, Verhaak RG, McKenna A, Campos B, Noushmehr H, Salama SR, Zheng S, Chakravarty D, Sanborn JZ, Berman SH, <i>et al.</i> The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. <i>Cell</i> 2013;<i>155:</i>462–477. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.034.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207