MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

126 Mapping neuro-oncological cellular landscape of human and mouse brain tumors using imaging mass cytometry

2023· article· en· W4388068153 on OpenAlexaff
Nick Zabinyakov, Qanber Raza, Christina Loh

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Standards Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMass cytometryHuman brainTumor microenvironmentPathologyBrain tumorFlow cytometryCancer researchBiologyMedicinePhenotypeNeuroscienceImmunologyTumor cells

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Brain cancer research presents challenges that require comprehensive assessment of the structural and cellular organization of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Imaging Mass Cytometry™ (IMC™) offers unprecedented insight into the TME by uncovering the spatial distribution of 40-plus distinct molecular markers without data artifacts caused by autofluorescence. We developed high-plex proteomic analysis tools to thoroughly characterize the TME of both human and mouse brain tissues using IMC. Here we present a deep phenotypic spatial analysis of various mouse and human brain tumors and identify cellular composition and activation of immuno-oncological processes within the TME. Methods The Maxpar® Neuro Phenotyping IMC Panel Kit (PN 201337) is designed for imaging application on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. This neural research-specific panel consists of human and mouse cross-reactive clones and is compatible with Maxpar Human and Maxpar OnDemand™ Mouse Immuno-Oncology IMC Panel Kits. It enables flexible panel design for brain-specific research goals, such as brain tumor classification, and assessment of inflammation and degeneration of specific brain resident and infiltrating cells. We assembled and applied a 39-plex antibody panel on human tissue microarrays containing a variety of brain tumors including glioblastoma, astrocytoma, gliosarcoma, and transitional meningioma. In addition, we assembled and applied a 36-plex antibody panel on mouse glioblastoma and neuroblastoma tissues. The Hyperion™ Imaging System was utilized to digitize images from the tissues followed by quantitative single-cell analysis to assess the cellular composition of cancerous brain TME. Results We identified major cell populations that make up human and mouse brain matter, such as neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes. We detected presence of extensive astrogliosis and microgliosis with a pattern of infiltration of lymphoid and myeloid immune cells such as T cells, B cells, and macrophages. We also detected antigen-presenting cells as well as tumor cells exhibiting expression of key cell differentiation markers. Additionally, we assessed vascular coverage and extracellular matrix composition within the TME. Subsequent single-cell analysis provided a comprehensive and quantitative assessment of the brain TME in our human and mouse samples. Our phenotypic analysis resolved the brain TME to the single-cell level and provided insights into the spatial complexity of neuronal neoplasms. Conclusions Empowered by high-plex neuro-oncology panels, IMC can accelerate translational brain tumor research and provide multiparametric insights into the spatial complexity of neuronal neoplasms. Ethics Approval The samples obtained for this study were sourced from an accredited commercial provider.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207