MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

1490 High-plex co-detection of RNA and protein to explore tumor-immune interactions utilizing RNAscope with imaging mass cytometry

2023· article· en· W4388071235 on OpenAlex
James Pemberton, Smriti Kala, Anushka Dikshit, Clinton Hupple

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Standards Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMass cytometryRNABiologyMolecular biologyComputational biologyPhenotypeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Future advancements in immuno-oncology will be propelled by the tools capable of deciphering the spatial organization of distinct cell types within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Imaging Mass Cytometry™ (IMC™) has proven its effectiveness in studying complex cellular interactions within the TME. By utilizing CyTOF® technology, IMC allows for the simultaneous assessment of over 40 protein markers with subcellular resolution, eliminating spectral overlap and background autofluorescence. However, the inclusion of certain targets in IMC is impossible if there are no commercially available antibodies that successfully detect these protein targets or if the targets are soluble factors such as cytokines and chemokines. Here we present a new workflow that synergizes the highly sensitive and specific RNAscope™ technology for RNA detection with IMC multiplexing capability to visualize crucial RNA and protein markers simultaneously. <h3>Methods</h3> To evaluate the expression of both RNA and protein targets in human FFPE tumor tissue microarrays (TMAs), we combined the RNAscope HiPlex v2 assay with protein detection on the Hyperion XTi™ Imaging System. The RNAscope assay employed 12 target RNA marker probes and their associated metal-labeled detection probes, specifically designed for compatibility with IMC. The recommended workflow for the RNAscope HiPlex v2 assay was followed, with the exception that for RNA detection, metal-conjugated probes were used instead of fluorophores. Metal-conjugated antibodies were used to detect proteins within the same tissue, resulting in a combined 31-marker co-detection panel. <h3>Results</h3> The identified target protein markers encompassed a diverse range of extracellular matrix, immune, tumor, stromal, and endothelial cells. Detection of RNA enabled the visualization of various cytokines and chemokines, including <i>CXCL13</i>, <i>CXCL9</i>, <i>CXCL10</i>, <i>IFNγ</i>, <i>IL10</i>, and <i>IL8</i>, thereby facilitating the identification of the cellular sources for these secreted factors. Additionally, the use of marker-specific antibodies allowed for the visualization of immune cell subpopulations and their activation states. Immune cell hubs associated with anti-tumor immune responses were detected in tumor niches throughout the TMA. <h3>Conclusions</h3> By integrating RNAscope with the IMC platform, we achieved simultaneous visualization of RNA and protein targets on the same sample to investigate the TME. The superior sensitivity for RNA detection offered by the RNAscope assay unlocks targets previously inaccessible through antibody detection. Thus, this new workflow complements existing multiplexing capabilities of IMC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it