Missense variants in SORT1 are associated with LDL-C in an Amish population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Common noncoding variants at the human 1p13.3 locus associated with SORT1 expression are among those most strongly associated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in human genome-wide association studies. However, validation studies in mice and cell lines have produced variable results regarding the directionality of the effect of SORT1 on LDL-C. This, together with the fact that the 1p13.3 variants are associated with expression of several genes, has raised the question of whether SORT1 is the causal gene at this locus. Using whole exome sequencing in members of an Amish population, we identified coding variants in SORT1 that are associated with increased (rs141749679, K302E) and decreased (rs149456022, Q225H) LDL-C. Further, analysis of plasma lipoprotein particle subclasses by ion mobility in a subset of rs141749679 (K302E) carriers revealed higher levels of large LDL particles compared to noncarriers. In contrast to the effect of these variants in the Amish, the sortilin K302E mutation introduced into a C57BL/6J mouse via CRISPR/Cas9 resulted in decreased non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the sortilin Q225H mutation did not alter cholesterol levels in mice. This is indicative of different effects of these mutations on cholesterol metabolism in the two species. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence that naturally occurring coding variants in SORT1 are associated with LDL-C, thus supporting SORT1 as the gene responsible for the association of the 1p13.3 locus with LDL-C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".