MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Reinforcement Learning Enabled Power Allocation for Multi-Connectivity C-V2X Downlink

2023· article· en· W4388077584 on OpenAlexaff
Jianzhe Xue, Kai Yu, Tianqi Zhang, Haibo Zhou, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsReinforcement learningTelecommunications linkComputer sciencePower (physics)Computer networkReinforcementArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) network is a promising solution to support on road diverse quality of services (QoS) such as ultra reliable low latency communication (URLLC) and enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB). However, satisfying the stringent QoS requirements in high-dynamic C-V2X environment is very challenge. In this paper, we leverage the multi-connectivity technology to enhance the reliability of downlink URLLC in C-V2X. Specifically, with the aid of the cloud radio access network (C-RAN), the network controller duplicates each URLLC packet and transmits its replicas over multiple independent wireless links. To ensure the reliability of URLLC links while maximizing the average rate of eMBB links, we design a coordinated multi-agent deep reinforcement learning algorithm for real-time power allocation of multi-connectivity URLLC links. Each URLLC link is treated as an agent here, and its transmit power is its action. The multiple links serving the same URLLC user are coordinated with a three-layer neural network for information sharing, allowing them to cooperatively choose transmit powers in terms of ensuring reliability while minimizing inter-cell interference and energy consumption. Extensive simulation results validate the effectiveness of the proposed power allocation algorithm for multi-connectivity downlink URLLC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207