MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

760 Interim PK/PD, safety and efficacy data of monotherapy dose escalation of a phase 1/2 study with MDNA11 in patients with advanced solid tumors

2023· article· en· W4388077811 on OpenAlexaff
Minh D. To, Rosemina Merchant, Victoria Atkinson, Philippe L. Bédard, Warren Brenner, Melissa Coello, Jesús Fuentes‐Antrás, Carole L. Galligan, Charlotte Lemech, Peter Lloyd, Sudhir Madduri Karanam, Kim Margolin, Matthen Mathew, Amy Prawira, Sajeve Thomas, Przemyslaw Twardowski, Arash Yavari, Fahar Merchant

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePharmacodynamicsAdverse effectPharmacokineticsInternal medicineDosingToxicityResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsMelanomaGastroenterologyOncologyPharmacologyPhases of clinical researchUrologyCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> MDNA11 is an albumin-fused long-acting IL-2 agonist with enhanced affinity for IL-2Rb and no binding to IL-2Ra, resulting in potent CD8<sup>+</sup> T and NK cell activation, limited Treg increase and reduced toxicities.<sup>1</sup> ABILITY (A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY) is a Phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) and preliminary clinical activity of MDNA11 as monotherapy and in combination with Prembrolizumab in pre-treated patients with advanced solid tumors. <h3>Methods</h3> The dose-escalation phase of ABILITY uses a modified 3+3 design to determine the recommended dose for expansion (RDE). Patients received a fixed dose of 3, 10 or 30 μg/kg (dose levels 1–3; DL1–3) by intravenous infusion on a Q2W schedule. Step-up dosing was implemented starting at DL4 where patients received 2 or 3 priming doses prior to the target dose of 60 μg/kg (DL4), 90 μg/kg (DL5) or 120 μg/kg (DL6). Primary endpoints include incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints include assessment of PK, PD and tumor response per RECISTv1.1 and iRECIST <h3>Results</h3> As of June 22, 2023, twenty dose limiting toxicity (DLT)-evaluable patients have been dosed with MDNA11 during monotherapy dose escalation (3–120 μg/kg). Tumor types enrolled included melanoma (n=11), renal cell carcinoma (n=2), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC; n=2), sarcoma (n=2), tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (n=1), gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma (n=1) and lung adenocarcinoma (n=1). PK analysis showed dose-dependent increase in MDNA11 exposure. Immune profiling showed robust lymphocyte expansion, including increase in CD8<sup>+</sup> T and NK cells and limited change in Tregs. There were no DLTs observed. The most common AEs were infusion related reaction (65%) comprising pyrexia (50%), nausea (45%), chills (35%), fatigue (30%) and diarrhea (25%), with the majority being grade 1–2 and resolved within 48–72 hours. Transient (~ 1week duration) transaminases increase was seen in 25% of patients. Tumor response was evaluated in 19 patients. Single-agent activity included stable disease (SD) observed in 6 patients, including a melanoma patient with SD beyond 1.5 year, and an ongoing partial response (PR) in a PDAC patient who had previously progressed on immune checkpoint inhibitor and is currently continuing on MDNA11 for &gt; 1 year. <h3>Conclusions</h3> MDNA11 is well tolerated with no DLTs up to target dose of 120 μg/kg on a Q2W schedule. Evidence of clinical activity includes SD in 6 of 19 patients in addition to a durable PR in a PDAC patient. Data analysis is ongoing to inform RDE selection. <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> We are grateful to all patients participating in this study. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> NCT: 05086692 <h3>Reference</h3> Merchant R, Galligan C, Munegowda MA, <i>et al</i>. Fine-tuned long-acting interleukin-2 superkine potentiates durable immune responses in mice and non-human primate. 2022;<b>10</b>:e003155. <h3>Ethics Approval</h3> The study was conducted with approval from institutional ethics committee and informed consent from participants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207