MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388078434 · doi:10.7759/cureus.48037

The Role of Childhood Obesity in Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scoping Review

2023· review· en· W4388078434 on OpenAlexaff
Uchechukwu S Oranika, Oluwakemi Lois Adeola, Thelma O Egbuchua, Okelue E Okobi, Daad Alrowaili, Emeka Okobi, Ademiluyi B David

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObesityChildhood obesityType 2 Diabetes MellitusDiabetes mellitusSystematic reviewType 2 diabetesInsulin resistancePsychological interventionPublic healthGerontologyMEDLINEOverweightEndocrinologyPathologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Childhood obesity is a growing concern worldwide, with significant implications for public health. Of particular interest is its association with the early onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children. Exploring this relationship and identifying contributing factors may help strengthen understanding of this complex relationship. Factors such as family history, gender, and sedentary lifestyle, and poor dietary habits, insulin resistance in adipose tissue have been identified as significant contributors to early-onset type 2 diabetes. The rising prevalence of childhood obesity and its association with diabetes necessitates early interventions to mitigate this concerning trend and ensure a lasting impact on public health. This scoping review aims to investigate the relationship between childhood obesity and early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus while also exploring other contributing factors. We employed a standardized framework for reviews to analyze relevant literature published in English between 2000 and 2021. Only primary research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses addressing the association between childhood obesity and early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) format. Out of the 3614 articles assessed, 17 were ultimately incorporated into this scoping review as they met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the literature primarily represented North American studies, with no inclusion of studies from South America. The findings from these studies have highlighted several factors contributing to type 2 diabetes mellitus development. Most of the studies associated obesity development with hypertension and unfavorable lipid profiles. It is important to acknowledge that these findings are derived from the available literature and may not encompass the entirety of research on childhood obesity and early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the limited regional diversity in the selected studies may restrict the generalizability of these findings to other geographic regions. Additional research involving diverse populations is imperative for a comprehensive understanding of the link between childhood obesity and early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin resistance in adipose tissue among obese individuals contributes to the transition from obesity to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Notably, this transition occurs at approximately half the duration in obese youths compared to obese adults, where it typically takes around a decade. The increasing prevalence of childhood obesity and diabetes mellitus in high-income, low-income, and middle-income countries necessitate collective efforts to reduce the increasing rates of early-onset type 2 diabetes in children. This scoping review, therefore, seeks to underscore the importance of early interventions with regard to ensuring a lasting impact capable of extending into adulthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.006
Bibliometrics0.0130.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet→French-language works237,207→