The interior spreading story of Labrador Sea Water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The unique convective anomalies of Labrador Sea Water (LSW) can be used as advective tracers when assessing equatorward spreading pathways and timescales of LSW. In this study, we explore advective pathways of two LSW classes formed in the 1990s and early 2000s, respectively, along constant neutral density planes. Hydrographic observations showcase the prevalence of both LSW classes within the Atlantic interior, supporting a recirculation feature that branches from the Deep Western Boundary Current (DWBC) at 36°N among other pathways. Spreading characteristics of both LSW classes from the Labrador Sea to the subtropics are reinforced through a spatial pattern analysis of salinity anomalies and geostrophic velocities along the characteristic neutral density planes of each respective LSW class. We observe both classes to advect out of the Labrador Sea to (i) the eastern subpolar region and down the eastern boundary towards the Atlantic interior, (ii) directly into the Atlantic interior likely from an injection by recirculations from the subpolar gyre and DWBC leakage, and (iii) equatorward along the western boundary via the DWBC. Findings highlight the abundance of LSW within the Atlantic interior, not just along the western boundary, suggesting that interior pathways play an influential role on the export of these subpolar climate signals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".