MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

1464 Endogenous retroviral protein particles in malignant pleural mesothelioma as potential immunotherapy targets; novel approaches for identification and prioritization

2023· article· en· W4388082927 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amin Zia, Licun Wu, Zhihong Yun, Fatemeh Zaeimi, Marc de Perrot

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitopeImmunotherapyComputational biologyGenomeHuman genomeGeneBiologyMesotheliomaAntigenCancerCancer researchBioinformaticsGeneticsMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer with median survival of 18 months. Due to the lack of proper tumour targets, no cellular immunotherapy is currently available for MPM. New non-ablative radiation and surgery combination therapy programs for MPM are underway at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto. As part of a comprehensive multiomics study of tumor microenvironment, we implemented a computational method for discovery and prioritization of endogenous retroviral protein (ERV) particles as novel antigen-specific targets in MPM. <h3>Methods</h3> We performed ERV gene-discovery based on identification of protein-coding open-reading frames with viral or bacterial origins.<sup>1</sup> An extended human reference genome was constructed with novel open-reading frames and single-cell RNAseq sequencing (<i>10Xgenomics Inc.</i>) reads of tumor samples were aligned and gene-count tables were computed. ERVs with less than ten aligned reads or present in only one patient were removed from the analysis. ERVs with transcripts overlapping <i>GTEx Consortium</i> database (10K samples, 56 tissues) were removed to ensure no remaining ERV was constitutively expressed in normal tissues. The ERVs were further annotated with experimentally validated T and B cell epitopes in the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB).<sup>2</sup> BLAST searches performed to identify humongous epitope of ERVs in human pathogen. A select set of identified transcripts were validated with PCR. <h3>Results</h3> Single-cell RNAseq expression of tumor microenvironment of 19 MPM patients was analyzed. All patients expressed two ERVs annotated in the human reference genome (ERV3–1, ERVK3–1) with another four (ERVFRD-1, ERVH48–1, ERVMER34–1, ERVW-1) expressed in at least 5 patients. We identified 400 ERVs not curated in the human reference genome with lengths of 95–3935 amino acids (1520.9525 +- 1069). From this, 224 contained at least one T-cell epitope (with presentation at MHC class-I and class-II) or B epitope (antibody binding) record in IEDB. 135 ERVs had at least one epitope with 100% homology in human pathogens. We further measured the expression (in terms of TPM) of identified genes in 2708 publicly available cell lines of 14 cancers. All 400 ERVs were shared with at least one and some with all 14 other cancers. <h3>Conclusions</h3> We identified several ERV proteins present in MPM tumors that are prominently encoded in intronic regions of but not curated in the human reference genome. Annotation of these proteins with homologues epitopes of human pathogen and IEDB epitopes provide opportunities for prioritization of these novel targets for T-cell therapies or antibody drugs. <h3>References</h3> Nakagawa S, Takahashi MU. gEVE: a genome-based endogenous viral element database provides comprehensive viral protein-coding sequences in mammalian genomes. <i>Database</i>, 2016;<i><b>2016</b></i>:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baw087 Vita R, Mahajan S, Overton JA, Dhanda SK, Martini S, Cantrell JR, Wheeler DK, Sette A, Peters B. The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB): 2018 update. <i>Nucleic Acids Research</i>, 2019;<i><b>47</b></i>(D1):D339-D343. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207