MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388089588 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2023-0148

Multiple verdazyl radicals appended to a triarylamine scaffold

2023· article· en· W4388089588 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Sydney Reiber, Bennett Templeman-Vivian, Michelle B. Mills, Christopher Tremblay, David C. Leitch, Erin T. Chernick

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsChemistryCyclic voltammetryElectron paramagnetic resonanceRadicalPhotochemistrySpectroscopyHyperfine structureUnpaired electronTriphenylamineAbsorbancePhysical chemistryElectrochemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceOrganic chemistryAtomic physicsElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the synthesis of three triphenylamine-based verdazyl radicals. These include a mono, bis, and tris(verdazyl) at the 4-position(s) of the N–Ar groups, containing one, two, and three unpaired electrons, respectively. Each of these compounds is air stable and fully characterized using EPR spectroscopy, high-resolution mass spectrometry, infrared spectroscopy, UV/Vis spectroscopy, and cyclic voltammetry. From the UV/Vis absorbance data, the optical absorbance energy gaps were found to be ∼2.35 eV for all three verdazyl-containing compounds. Cyclic voltammetry was used to estimate the energy levels of the singly occupied molecular orbitals, which are −4.91, −5.12, and −4.98 eV for mono, bis, and tris(verdazyl) compounds, respectively. Spin–spin exchange interactions were observed in the EPR spectra of both the bis and tris(verdazyl)s, leading to additional hyperfine coupling patterns and assignment of the ground states as triplet and quartet, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMagnetism in coordination complexesFrench-language works237,207