MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2023· article· en· W4388113066 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMATEC Web of Conferences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2023 International Conference on Materials Engineering, New Energy, and Chemistry (MENEC 2023), held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from October 13 to October 15, served as a pivotal forum where researchers and experts from diverse yet interconnected domains converged to exchange research findings.MENEC 2023 was dedicated to advancing collaboration technologies within the realms of materials engineering, new energy, and chemistry, encompassing research and development in academic and industrial sectors.Collaboration technologies encompassed various elements such as theories, methodologies, mechanisms, protocols, software tools, platforms, and services, all of which fostered interaction, coordination, communication, and collaboration among individuals and software and hardware systems. Aims:Providing a platform for researchers, practitioners, and academics to exchange their experiences, ideas, and research discoveries in the fields of materials engineering, new energy, and chemistry.Facilitating discussions on the latest advancements, challenges, and opportunities within these domains.Identifying research gaps, exploring new avenues, and promoting collaborations among researchers, academics, and practitioners.Cultivating interdisciplinary dialogues and advocating for the integration of materials engineering, new energy, and chemistry to address complex problems.The conference featured a total of 3 keynote speeches and 2 invited speeches and attracted approximately 120 delegates from 10 countries, including China, India, Canada, the UK, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, South Africa, and Australia.The event encompassed a wide range of highly technical presentations delivered through keynote and invited speaker sessions, as well as by authors of submitted papers.We anticipate that this conference will inspire future research in renewable energy and ecosystems.We eagerly look forward to welcoming all of you to the next MENEC conference.,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it