A FEM for three‐field <i>u</i>–<i>p</i>–η poroelasticity with nonreciprocal interactions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The de la Cruz and Spanos (dCS) theory of poroelasticity is a pore‐scale volume averaged formulation and differs from the widely used Biot (BT) theory. A novel Finite Element Method (FEM) is developed for dCS theory to enable the study of nonreciprocal solid–fluid interactions, which are omitted from BT model. Solid deformations are quasi‐static and pore fluid flow is transient; dynamic effects are neglected. The form of the dCS theory chosen includes BT theory as a special case. The governing equations are written in terms of three fields: solid displacement u , fluid pressure p , and porosity η. Fully implicit time integration and a mixed‐element formulation are employed to ensure stability. The convergence rate of the FEM dCS model is shown to be optimal in a one‐dimensional consolidation problem. Examples of a footing and subsurface injection problems in two dimensions further attest the robustness of the implementation and are shown to reproduce BT model results as a special case. The effect of nonreciprocal solid–fluid interactions is studied in all examples and shows a wide range of importance depending on the properties of the porous media (e.g., permeability) and problem‐specific constraints. The developed FEM provides a tool to enable further comparisons between dCS and BT theories and validation in practical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it