Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractAlberta has historically been a one-party dominant system by electing a series of party dynasties from 1905 to 2015. However, Alberta started a transition to a two-party system when the NDP formed government following the 2015 election. This process was solidified with the 2019 election that saw the UCP and NDP as the only parties that won seats and received over 87% combined in the popular vote. The UCP (a consequence of a merger between the PCs and Wildrose Party) won a landslide election in 2019, but, unlike in previous Alberta elections, the former governing party did not disappear. The NDP won all but one seat in Edmonton, won seats in Calgary and Lethbridge, and re-elected Premier Rachel Notley and ten former Cabinet Ministers. Since the 2019 election, measures such as voter turnout, polling, fundraising, and the resilience of the UCP indicate the continuation of the two-party system. RésuméL'Alberta a toujours été un système à parti unique dominant en élisant une série de dynasties de partis de 1905 à 2015. Cependant, l'Alberta a entamé une transition vers un système à deux partis lorsque le NPD a formé le gouvernement après les élections de 2015. Ce processus s'est solidifié avec les élections de 2019 qui ont vu l'UCP et le NPD comme les seuls partis à avoir remporté des sièges et obtenu plus de 87 % combinés lors du vote populaire. L'UCP (conséquence d'une fusion entre les PC et le Wildrose Party) a remporté une élection écrasante en 2019, mais, contrairement aux précédentes élections albertaines, l'ancien parti au pouvoir n'a pas disparu. Le NPD a remporté tous les sièges sauf un à Edmonton, a remporté des sièges à Calgary et à Lethbridge et a réélu la première ministre Rachel Notley et dix anciens ministres du Cabinet. Depuis les élections de 2019, des mesures telles que la participation électorale, les sondages, la collecte de fonds et la résilience de l'UCP indiquent la poursuite du système bipartite.Key Words: Two-party system, One-party dominant system, 2015 Alberta Election, 2019 Alberta electionMots-clés; Système bipartite, Système dominant à parti unique, Élection albertaine 2015, Élection albertaine 2019
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".