Reported barriers to physical activity and the role of built environment among overweight and obese youth attending a Canadian pediatric weight management clinic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To assess activity levels and role of the built environment among overweight and obese youth referred to a pediatric weight management clinic. Design: A cross-sectional study using a caregiver-administered survey was completed from October 2017 to February 2018. Results: The study analyzed 210 surveys. Participants were 52 % male and average age was 11.6 years (3-18 years). Of those surveyed, 73 % of respondents reported ≥ 2 h of average daily screen time in the past 3 months, and 74 % of children partook in < 60 min of daily physical activity of any intensity. The most common location for physical activity was a recreational facility. The least common was nearby green spaces. Moreover, 77 % of caregivers felt that their child did not engage in enough physical activity, and the most common cited barrier was motivation. The built environment, however, was not cited as a barrier to active living as 90 % of caregivers reported their community was safe, and greater than 80 % of caregivers agreed their community was aesthetically beautiful, well connected with good infrastructure. The majority of commonly used spaces were located within 2 km of their home, however, it was uncommon for children to walk or bike to them. Conclusion: Overweight and obese children referred to our clinic are not meeting national recommendations for physical activity and screen time. The built environment does not appear to be a large contributing factor to decreased physical activity in this population and the most common reason cited for lack of physical activity was motivation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".