Psikoedukasi Tentang Quarter Life Crisis: “Berdamai Dengan Diri Sendiri, Sadarilah Dirimu Berharga”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem that is often experienced by young adults today is not being able to accept or forgive themselves, which may be due to mistakes or failures experienced in the past. The psychoeducation program aims to provide education about the Quarter Life Crisis and offer educational strategies to improve quality of life, communication skills, and problem-solving. This study used quantitative methods and data analysis techniques, i.e descriptive statistical analysis. The sampling technique used in this study was purposive random sampling, from 10 early adult subjects. This study uses a pre-test and post-test scale. The research data were analyzed using the Paired Sample T-Test which obtained a significance value based on the results of data analysis using SPSS 24. It was found that the results of the pre-test < Post-test or 18.9000 < 30.4000. It can be concluded that this program has increased knowledge related to Quarter Life Crisis. This study illustrates that psychoeducation has succeeded in providing knowledge about quarter life crises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".