Hubungan Antara Efikasi Diri Dengan Quarter Life Crisis Pada Alumni Dari Tiga Perguruan Tinggi Di Kota Makassar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarterlife crisis is an emotional crisis in the form of negative emotions in individuals in early adulthood. Negative emotions that occur can inhibit individual productivity, and even cause disturbances both physically and mentally. This study aims to determine the relationship between self-efficacy and quarter-life crisis in college alumni. The sample in this study were 115 individuals aged 22-30 years who were graduate from universities in Makassar. The research method uses quantitative methods with data collection techniques using a Likert scale, namely the QLC scale from Mutiara (2018) and the self-efficacy scale made by the researcher. The results of hypothesis testing using the Spearman Rank Correlation test showed significant results with a total of 0.00 (p < 0.05) and a correlation coefficient of -0.418. These results indicate that there is a relationship between self-efficacy and quarterlife crisis, which means Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected. It can be concluded that there is a significant relationship between self-efficacy and quarter-life crisis in college graduates in Makassar. It was found that the lower the level of self-efficacy, the higher the level of the individual's quarterlife crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".