MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388187108 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21677

On the structural and electrical properties of MgFe2O4, MgMn0.2Fe1.8O4, and Mn3O4

2023· article· en· W4388187108 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEngineeringMaterials scienceEngineering drawingEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Charge carrier transport via donor/acceptor pairs of similar elements is dominant in n-type MgFe 2 O 4 and p-type Mn 3 O 4 spinels. The temperature-independent activation energy in the form of the nearest neighbor hopping model is applied for Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ pairs of cubic MgFe 2 O 4 spinel in the temperature range of 423–523 K (150–250 °C). At such high temperatures, even for this relatively narrow temperature range, the constant energy barrier deviates to a variable range hopping energy barrier in the case of Mn 3 O 4 , due to Jahn-Teller active octahedral sites. Replacing 10 mol% of Fe at octahedral sites with Mn has significantly increased the electron hopping energy barrier and electrical conductivity of MgFe 2 O 4 , while keeping the nearest neighbor hopping model dominant. The observed high energy barrier is due to donor/acceptor pairs of different elements (Mn/Fe). Due to a lack of structural distortion, deviation from the nearest neighbor hopping mechanism with temperature-independent activation energy was not observed. Rietveld refined XRD patterns and FT-IR spectra are utilized to support the argument on electrical conductivity mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it