On the structural and electrical properties of MgFe2O4, MgMn0.2Fe1.8O4, and Mn3O4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Charge carrier transport via donor/acceptor pairs of similar elements is dominant in n-type MgFe 2 O 4 and p-type Mn 3 O 4 spinels. The temperature-independent activation energy in the form of the nearest neighbor hopping model is applied for Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ pairs of cubic MgFe 2 O 4 spinel in the temperature range of 423–523 K (150–250 °C). At such high temperatures, even for this relatively narrow temperature range, the constant energy barrier deviates to a variable range hopping energy barrier in the case of Mn 3 O 4 , due to Jahn-Teller active octahedral sites. Replacing 10 mol% of Fe at octahedral sites with Mn has significantly increased the electron hopping energy barrier and electrical conductivity of MgFe 2 O 4 , while keeping the nearest neighbor hopping model dominant. The observed high energy barrier is due to donor/acceptor pairs of different elements (Mn/Fe). Due to a lack of structural distortion, deviation from the nearest neighbor hopping mechanism with temperature-independent activation energy was not observed. Rietveld refined XRD patterns and FT-IR spectra are utilized to support the argument on electrical conductivity mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".