MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388190118 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100540

Compact 28GHz Microstrip Patch Antenna Design with Reduced SAR for 5G Applications

2023· article· en· W4388190118 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huda A. Al-Tayyar, Y. E. Mohammed Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Mosul
KeywordsMicrostrip antennaPatch antennaComputer scienceAntenna (radio)MicrostripElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fulfilling the requirements of 5G applications necessitates the design of low-cost, compact, and high-performance antennas capable of supporting high data rates.As these antennas are often in direct contact with the human body, it is imperative to limit radiation exposure.This study presents the design of a Microstrip Patch Antenna (MSPA) with a resonant frequency of 28 GHz.The performance of the proposed design is evaluated using Computer Simulation Technology (CST) software.Considering the importance of compactness in 5G applications, the dimensions of the proposed antenna have been optimized for this purpose.This paper also discusses the role of the ground plane in reducing the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR).The proposed MSPA design demonstrates a high gain of 7.3 dB, a radiation efficiency of 89.4%, and compact dimensions of 5.18×3.36×0.3mm.The maximum SAR value is 1.68 W/kg (per 1 g of tissue), or 0.121 W/kg (per 10 g of tissue).These results suggest that the proposed design holds promising potential for enabling low-cost, compact, high-speed 5G devices that are safe for human tissues.This is particularly relevant for wearable devices, the Internet of Things (IoT), and mobile wireless networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207