SemanticRT: A Large-Scale Dataset and Method for Robust Semantic Segmentation in Multispectral Images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Growing interests in multispectral semantic segmentation (MSS) have been witnessed in recent years, thanks to the unique advantages of combining RGB and thermal infrared images to tackle challenging scenarios with adverse conditions. However, unlike traditional RGB-only semantic segmentation, the lack of a large-scale MSS dataset has become a hindrance to the progress of this field. To address this issue, we introduce a SemanticRT dataset - the largest MSS dataset to date, comprising 11,371 high-quality, pixel-level annotated RGB-thermal image pairs. It is 7 times larger than the existing MFNet dataset, and covers a wide variety of challenging scenarios in adverse lighting conditions such as low-light and pitch black. Further, a novel Explicit Complement Modeling (ECM) framework is developed to extract modality-specific information, which is propagated through a robust cross-modal feature encoding and fusion process. Extensive experiments demonstrate the advantages of our approach and dataset over the existing counterparts. Our new dataset may also facilitate further development and evaluation of existing and new MSS algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it