Measuring Ice Pellets and Refrozen Wet Snow Using a Laser-Optical Disdrometer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study aims to characterize the shapes and fall speeds of ice pellets formed in various atmospheric conditions and to investigate the possibility to use a laser-optical disdrometer to distinguish between ice pellets and other types of precipitation. To do so, four ice pellet events were documented using manual observations, macrophotography, and laser-optical disdrometer data. First, various ice pellet fall speeds and shapes, including spherical, bulged, fractured, and irregular particles, were associated with distinct atmospheric conditions. A higher fraction of bulged and fractured ice pellets was observed when solid precipitation was completely melted aloft while more irregular particles were observed during partial melting. These characteristics affected the diameter–fall speed relations measured. Second, the measurements of particles’ fall speed and diameter show that ice pellets could be differentiated from rain or freezing rain. Ice pellets larger than 1.5 mm tend to fall > 0.5 m s−1 slower than raindrops of the same size. In addition, the fall speed of a small fraction of ice pellets was < 2 m s−1 regardless of their size, as compared with a fall speed > 3 m s−1 for ice pellets with diameter > 1.5 mm. Video analysis suggests that these slower particles could be ice pellets passing through the laser-optical disdrometer after colliding with the head of the instrument. Overall, these findings contribute to a better understanding of the microphysics of ice pellets and their measurement using a laser-optical disdrometer. Significance Statement Ice pellets are challenging to forecast and to detect automatically. In this study, we documented the fall speed and physical characteristics of ice pellets during various atmospheric conditions using a combination of a laser-optical disdrometer, manual observations, and macrophotography images. Relationships were found between the shape and fall speed of ice pellets. These findings could be used to refine the parameterization of ice pellets in atmospheric models and, consequently, improve the forecast of impactful winter precipitation types such as freezing rain. Furthermore, they will also help to physically interpret laser-optical disdrometer data during ice pellets and freezing rain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".