Hybrid Algorithm of Backpropagation and Relevance Vector Machine with Radial Basis Function Kernel for Hydro-Climatological Data Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hydro-climatological data serves a pivotal role in monitoring climatic alterations and facilitating agricultural planning, inclusive of evapotranspiration estimation, water management, and crop pattern design. The necessity to accurately and expeditiously model and forecast this data underscores the need for effective methodologies. This paper introduces a hybrid algorithm, integrating backpropagation and relevance vector machine (BP-RVM) with a radial basis function (RBF) kernel. A comparative analysis was conducted between RBF and Logsig activation functions in conjunction with resilient backpropagation (trainrp) and Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation (trainlm). The algorithm was employed to predict and categorize rainfall, temperature, wind speed, humidity, and sunshine duration data. Through extensive trials, the architecture parameters in the training-testing process of the BP-RVM algorithm were meticulously determined. Mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values were classified as indicating high forecast accuracy (<10%). Despite the RBF-trainlm kernel function combination exhibiting a faster epoch completion rate, the BP-RVM algorithm with the RBF-trainrp kernel function combination is recommended for future data prediction stages due to its lower error generation. The BP-RVM-RBF-trainrp algorithm outperformed BP-RVM-RBF-trainlm, with an average error difference of 1.39% in the training process and 2.28% in the testing process. The identified algorithms and architectures present potential for future applications in evapotranspiration calculation and crop pattern planning based on hydro-climatological data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".