MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388201889 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100521

Hybrid Algorithm of Backpropagation and Relevance Vector Machine with Radial Basis Function Kernel for Hydro-Climatological Data Prediction

2023· article· en· W4388201889 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackpropagationRadial basis functionComputer scienceArtificial neural networkRelevance vector machineMachine learningAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceEvapotranspirationMean squared errorSupport vector machineKernel (algebra)Wind speedData miningMathematicsStatisticsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydro-climatological data serves a pivotal role in monitoring climatic alterations and facilitating agricultural planning, inclusive of evapotranspiration estimation, water management, and crop pattern design. The necessity to accurately and expeditiously model and forecast this data underscores the need for effective methodologies. This paper introduces a hybrid algorithm, integrating backpropagation and relevance vector machine (BP-RVM) with a radial basis function (RBF) kernel. A comparative analysis was conducted between RBF and Logsig activation functions in conjunction with resilient backpropagation (trainrp) and Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation (trainlm). The algorithm was employed to predict and categorize rainfall, temperature, wind speed, humidity, and sunshine duration data. Through extensive trials, the architecture parameters in the training-testing process of the BP-RVM algorithm were meticulously determined. Mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values were classified as indicating high forecast accuracy (<10%). Despite the RBF-trainlm kernel function combination exhibiting a faster epoch completion rate, the BP-RVM algorithm with the RBF-trainrp kernel function combination is recommended for future data prediction stages due to its lower error generation. The BP-RVM-RBF-trainrp algorithm outperformed BP-RVM-RBF-trainlm, with an average error difference of 1.39% in the training process and 2.28% in the testing process. The identified algorithms and architectures present potential for future applications in evapotranspiration calculation and crop pattern planning based on hydro-climatological data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it