Exploring the meta-transitions of first level elite athletes in the Chinese Whole Nation System: A polyphonic reflective tale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We aim to advance athlete career scholarship using meta-transitions within the Chinese Whole Nation System (CWNS). The intentions are to: (a) provide in-depth understandings of Chinese elite athletes’ careers through shared dialog, (b) transform knowledge and support prospective athletes, and (c) contribute to the advancement of the CWNS by exploring its impact on elite athletes’ career development and transitions. A polyphonic reflective tale is introduced to extend reflective practice through amalgamating group reflections and represent our cultural reflections as former elite athletes. Group reflections were applied as a data collection method and a learning tool to increase self-awareness and understanding of our athletic careers. Our polyphonic reflective tale revealed barriers, resources, and thoughts through seven meta-transition vignettes, each a small turn relating to athletic and personal development, beginning with incipiency into elite table tennis (first level career) and spanning transitions into our post-sport careers: (a) the first level aspiration, (b) transition to the first level, (c) acclimation to the first level, (d) first level developments/improvements, (e) the first level trajectory, (f) post-first level career explorations, and (g) post-first level career developments. The polyphonic reflective tale is discussed as a career assistance strategy to support athletes’ careers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".