MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388207837 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2023.08.256

9660 Risk Factors for Major Complications Following Minimally Invasive Surgeries for Endometriosis in the United States

2023· article· en· W4388207837 on OpenAlexaff
KM Hamilton, Yoav Brezinov, Gabriel Levin, R Schneyer, Mireille Truong, Raanan Meyer, Kelly N. Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometriosis Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEndometriosisInvasive surgeryGeneral surgerySurgeryGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To study the rate and risk factors for short-term post-operative complications of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for endometriosis in the United States. Retrospective cohort study. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2012-2020. Patients with endometriosis diagnosis. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. We compared women with and without 30-day post-operative major complications, defined according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. 28,697 women underwent minimally invasive surgery during the study period, of which 2.6% had major post-operative complications. Organ space surgical site infection and reoperation were the most common complications (47.0% and 39.8%, respectively). In multivariable regression analysis, African American race [aOR 95%CI 1.61 (1.29-2.01), p<0.001], hypertension [aOR 95%CI 1.23 (1.02-1.50), p=0.035], bleeding disorders [aOR 95%CI 1.96 (1.03-3.73), p=0.042], bowel procedures [aOR 95%CI 2.03 (1.61-2.56), p<0.001] and hysterectomy [aOR 95%CI 2.12 (1.74-2.57), p<0.001] were independently associated with increased risk of major complications. In a subanalysis of laparoscopies without bowel procedures, the rate of major complications was 2.5%. In multivariable regression analysis, African American race [aOR 95% CI 1.57 (1.22-2.01), p<0.001], bleeding disorders [aOR 95% CI 2.06 (1.05-4.08), p=0.037] and hysterectomy [aOR 95% CI 1.95 2.76 (2.16-3.53), p<0.001] were associated with increased major complication risk. Bowel procedures were performed in 2,041 cases, with a major complication rate of 4.3%. In multivariable regression analysis, African American race [aOR 95%CI 1.76 (1.02-3.06), p=0.043], immunosuppressive therapy [aOR 95%CI 3.04 (1.15-8.00), p=0.025] and colectomy [aOR 95%CI 1.96 (1.26-3.06), p=0.003] were associated with increased major complication risk. Among women undergoing minimally invasive surgery for endometriosis, African American race, hypertension, bleeding disorders and bowel surgery or hysterectomy are risk factors for major complications. African American race is a risk factor for major complications among women undergoing surgeries with and without bowel procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Minimally Invasive GynecologySame topicEndometriosis Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207