MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388210273 · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ad08db

Long-term stability of hydroxyapatite bone phantoms for the calibration of in vivo x-ray fluorescence spectrometry-based systems of bone lead and strontium quantification

2023· article· en· W4388210273 on OpenAlex
Matthew Micsa, Diana Ha, Eric Da Silva

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Physics & Engineering Express · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStrontiumCalibrationIn vivoTerm (time)Mass spectrometryFluorescenceBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceFluorescence spectrometryChemistryChromatographyOpticsMedicineMathematicsPhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hydroxyapatite (HAp) phantoms have been proposed as an alternative to plaster of Paris (poP) phantoms for the calibration of x-ray fluorescence-based systems for the in vivo quantification of bone lead and strontium which employ a coherent normalization procedure. The chemical composition of the material becomes critical in the calculation, or omission, of the coherent correction factor (CCF) required in this normalization procedure. This study evaluated the long-term chemical stability of HAp phantoms. Phantoms were prepared and allowed to age for a two week period and over a seven year period in ambient conditions. The chemical composition of the phantoms was then assessed by powder x-ray diffraction. Two week old phantoms were found to be composed of HAp with only a small amount of contamination from CaHPO 4 ·2H 2 O. Seven year old phantoms were found to have converted nearly completely to a carbonate-bearing apatite in the form of Ca 10 (PO 4 ) 6 (CO 3 ) 0.75 (OH) 0.5 indicating that the HAp phantom material likely reacts with carbon dioxide in air over time forming a carbonate-bearing apatite. The influence of this chemical conversion was assessed at the level of relevant cross-sections. Calibration under the assumption that the material is HAp when in fact it is a carbonate-bearing apatite would result in not more than a 0.2%–2% bias in the total mass attenuation coefficient within the photon energy range of 0–100 keV. Differential scattering cross-section for coherent scattering was found to differ between HAp and carbonate-bearing apatite by 0.9%–2% for both a 35.5 keV and 88.0 keV γ -ray. This variation in the differential scattering cross-section for coherent scattering may introduce a ca. 2% bias in the CCF used within the coherent normalization-based calibration procedure. Using HAp phantoms as calibrators thus requires acknowledgement of this conversion in chemical form and possible introduction of uncertainty into the calibration procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it