Density effects on streamwise-orientated vorticity at river confluences: a laboratory investigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Small differences in the densities of a river confluence's tributaries (i.e. 0.5 kg m $^{-3}$ ) have been proposed to cause coherent streamwise-oriented vortices (SOVs) in its mixing interface. These secondary flow structures are thought to result from density-driven gravity currents being laterally confined between the converging flows. However, empirical evidence for density SOVs and the confined gravity current mechanism is lacking. To this end, experiments are carried out in a laboratory confluence permitting a spectrum of thermal density differences between its tributaries. Particle image velocimetry and laser-induced fluorescence are used simultaneously to study the mixing interface's dynamics. The sensitivity of the mixing interface's secondary flow structure to the confluence's momentum ratio and the magnitude of the density difference is evaluated. Density SOVs are confirmed in the mixing interface and are caused by the gravity currents being confined laterally as the opposing flows merge and accelerate downstream. The SOVs are largest and most coherent when the momentum of the dense channel is greater than that of the light channel. The dynamics of these secondary flow structures is strongly coupled to periodic vertically orientated Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities. The striking similarities between the empirically reproduced SOVs herein and those recently observed at the Coaticook-Massawippi confluence (Quebec, Canada), despite a two-order magnitude difference in physical scale, suggest density SOVs are a scale-independent flow structure at confluences when specific, yet relatively common, hydraulic and density conditions align.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".