MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388226645 · doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2023.103805

Partial C-terminal truncation of Bx and Dy high molecular weight glutenin subunits after conserved aspartate

2023· article· en· W4388226645 on OpenAlexaff
Ray Bacala, D. W. Hatcher, Hélène Perreault, Bin Xiao Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cereal Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGluteninGlutenWheat glutenConserved sequenceBiologyBiochemistryFunction (biology)Residue (chemistry)ChemistryGeneticsProtein subunitPeptide sequenceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The composition of polymeric gluten proteins and interaction with non-covalently associated gliadins define the functional utility of a flour. This composition is dictated by the timing of cellular and genetic events in the plant and the developing seed. This interplay and its effect on gluten functionality is poorly understood and could provide a new opportunity for improving wheat quality in the future. Truncated proteoforms of high-molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMWGS) were observed for Bx and Dy subtypes across 49 Canadian bread wheat and 16 durum varieties. The relative abundances of these variants ranged from 7.5% to 37.7% and abundances of Bx and Dy variants were highly correlated (r2 = 0.85). HMWGS Bx7* and Dy10 were purified and the mass difference was shown to be from the loss of a C-terminal hexapeptide after a conserved aspartate residue. This aspartate was present at the ω-7 position in >90% of HMWGS accessions and the C-terminal sequence was highly conserved. Importantly, all HMWGS subtypes contain the same conserved sequences, but truncated variants were never observed for By, Dx and Ax HMWGS. The potential impact of these truncated HMWGS on gluten form and function is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cereal ScienceSame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207