MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388247903 · doi:10.5430/afr.v12n4p86

Inventory Management Practices among Small and Micro Businesses during COVID-19 Pandemic

2023· article· en· W4388247903 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tuan Zainun Tuan Mat, Marshita Hashim, Shukriah Saad, Mohd Badrulhisham Ismail

Bibliographic record

VenueAccounting and Finance Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessPandemicMarketingGovernment (linguistics)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)ScrutinyEconomic shortage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developing micro, small, and medium businesses (SMEs) encourages Malaysia's economic growth. The Covid-19 pandemic has greatly affected SMEs. During the Covid-19 pandemic, with material shortages and shipping delays, the ability to track the inventory is critical. Adopting digital technology in the inventory tracking process will assist the company in managing its inventory effectively. SMEs need to have relevant knowledge and technical skills to adopt digital technology. Specifically, this study explores SMEs' current inventory management practices to gauge their knowledge of inventory management. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews using a questionnaire with ten SMEs in Selangor. This study documents that SME organisation value is positively associated with best inventory management practices. In addition, results show that divergence can intensify the negative relationship between low inventory management practices and SMEs' value. Findings support the need for more scrutiny by SME owners, regulators, policymakers, and standard setters to monitor the conflict, which is crucial for SMEs to overcome the issues and challenges they face. This study will contribute to the sustainability of SMEs, consistent with the national agenda to strengthen the SMEs as highlighted in the government’s new Economic Transformation Program (ETP) through Bumiputera’s Economic Transformation Agenda.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.222
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccounting and Finance ResearchSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207