Genome-wide association analysis of tan spot disease resistance in durum wheat accessions from Tunisia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Tunisia harbors a rich collection of unexploited durum wheat landraces ( Triticum durum ssp. durum ) that have been gradually replaced by elite cultivars since the 1970s. These landraces represent an important potential source for broadening the genetic background of elite durum wheat cultivars and for the introgression of novel genes for key traits, including disease resistance, into these cultivars. Methods: In this study, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were used to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of a core collection of 235 durum wheat accessions consisting mainly of landraces. The high phenotypic and genetic diversity of the fungal pathogen Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (cause of tan spot disease of wheat) in Tunisia allowed the assessment of the accessions for tan spot resistance at the adult plant stage under field conditions over three cropping seasons. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed using a 90k SNP array. Results: Bayesian population structure analysis with 9191 polymorphic SNP markers classified the accessions into two groups, where groups 1 and 2 included 49.79% and 31.49% of the accessions, respectively, while the remaining 18.72% were admixtures. Principal coordinate analysis, the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean and the neighbor-joining method clustered the accessions into three to five groups. Analysis of molecular variance indicated that 76% of the genetic variation was among individuals and 23% was between individuals. Genome-wide association analyses identified 26 SNPs associated with tan spot resistance and explained between 8.1% to 20.2% of the phenotypic variation. The SNPs were located on chromosomes 1B (1 SNP), 2B (4 SNPs), 3A (2 SNPs), 3B (2 SNPs), 4A (2 SNPs), 4B (1 SNP), 5A (2 SNPs), 5B (4 SNPs), 6A (5 SNPs), 6B (2 SNPs), and 7B (1 SNP). Four markers, one on each of chromosomes 1B, and 5A, and two on 5B, coincided with previously reported SNPs for tan spot resistance, while the remaining SNPs were either novel markers or closely related to previously reported SNPs. Eight durum wheat accessions were identified as possible novel sources of tan spot resistance that could be introgressed into elite cultivars. Conclusion: The results highlighted the significance of chromosomes 2B, 5B, and 6A as genomic regions associated with tan spot resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".