MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adaptability of accessions of filmy oats in the collection nursery

2023· article· en· W4388275894 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. V. Krotova, Г. А. Баталова

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural science Euro-North-East · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
KeywordsAdaptabilityYield (engineering)Abiotic componentBiologyHorticultureMathematicsPhysicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is urgent to study the ecological and adaptive ability of oat samples in specific growing conditions to obtain high yields and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. In 2020-2022 in the conditions of Kirov region 47 samples of oats (standard - variety Krechet) were studied. Unfavorable conditions for the formation of yield were in 2021 (Ij = -1.2), relatively favorable – in 2020 (Ij = +0.4) and 2022 (Ij = +0.8). Yield of samples varied among the years, with the coefficient of variation varying from 2.9 % (к-14221 Рс 60, Canada) to 75.4 % (к-15536 UFRGS-11, Brazil). Twenty-four accessions, including к-15547, к-14649 (Russia), к-15464 (Kazakhstan), к-15533, к-15545, к-1554 (Brazil), к-15583, к-15585 (Sweden), etc., were responsive to improvement of growing conditions (bi>1). The amplitude of productivity changes is characterized by the stability index (Si 2 ). Stability of yield of samples к-15530 UFRGS-2, к-15541 UFRGS-17 (Brazil), к-13658 Рс 35, к-14221 Рс 60 (Canada) varied within 0.04...0.79. Samples from Canada (к-14221, к-13670), Brazil (к-15530, к-15541) and Sweden (к-15586) were the most stress tolerant. Genetic flexibility shows the reaction of plants to growing conditions, the maximum values of the trait (433 ...527 g/m2 ) were observed in samples к-15542 UFRGS-18 (Brazil), к-14648 Argamak (Russia), к-14397 Рс 67 (Canada), к-15583 Mutant 230, к-15585 Mutant 261 (Sweden). According to the results of the tests, 11 samples were selected for obtaining source material with the required parameters. The samples к-15541 UFRGS-17, к-15542 UFRGS-18, к-13662 Pc 45, к-14668 Pc 54, к-13187 Pc-56, к-14431 Pc 59, к-13658 Pc 35, к-14221 Pc 60, к-14396 Pc 64, к-14397 Pc 67 are recommended for inclusion in breeding programs. These samples are characterized by adaptability to varying growing conditions according to the "yield" trait.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultural science Euro-North-EastSame topicAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementFrench-language works237,207