MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388296996 · doi:10.1101/2023.11.02.565001

Feasibility Study Utilizing NanoString’s Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) Technology for Characterizing the Immune Microenvironment in Barrett’s Esophagus FFPE Tissues

2023· preprint· en· W4388296996 on OpenAlexaff
Qurat Ul Ain, Nicola Frei, Amir M. Khoshiwal, Robert D. Odze, Lorenzo Ferri, Lucas C. Duits, Jacques Bergman, Matthew D. Stachler

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal General Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsTumor microenvironmentBarrett's esophagusImmune systemDysplasiaEsophagusStromaCancer researchBiologyMultiplexPathologyMedicineAdenocarcinomaImmunologyCancerBioinformaticsImmunohistochemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To date, characterization of the Barrett’s esophagus (BE) immune microenvironment in patients with known progression status to determine how the microenvironment may influence BE progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has been understudied, hindering both the biological understanding of progression and the development of novel diagnostics and therapies. Therefore, this study’s aim was to determine if highly multiplex interrogation of the immune microenvironment can be performed on endoscopic formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples utilizing the Nanostring GeoMx digital spatial profiling (GeoMx DSP) platform. We performed spatial proteomic analysis of 49 proteins expressed in the microenvironment and epithelial cells of histologically identical FFPE endoscopic biopsies from patients with non-dysplastic BE (NDBE) who later progressed to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or EAC (N=7) or from patients who after at least 5 years follow up did not (N=8). In addition, we performed RNA analysis of 1,812 cancer related transcripts on a series of three endoscopic mucosal resections containing regions of normal tissue, BE, dysplasia (DYS), and EAC. Our primary goal was to determine feasibility of this approach and begin to identify the types of specific immune cell populations that may mediate the progression of pre-neoplastic BE to EAC. Spatial proteomic and transcriptomic profiling with GeoMx DSP showed reasonable quality metrics and detected expected differences between epithelium and stroma. Several proteins were found to have increased expression within non-dysplastic BE biopsies from progressors compared to non-progressors, suggesting further studies on the BE microenvironment are warranted. Summary New biological insights into the stepwise development and progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) from Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are imperative to develop tailored approaches for early detection and optimal clinical management of the disease. This study aimed to determine the feasibility to spatially profile stromal and immunologic properties that accompany malignant transformation of BE to EAC in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. NanoString’s Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) technology can detect and quantify protein and RNA transcripts in a highly multiplexed manner with spatial resolution, within specific regions of interest on FFPE tissue. Here, we performed a pilot study using the Nanostring GeoMx DSP, for measurement of protein and ribonucleic acid (RNA) expression on a series of FFPE slides from endoscopic biopsies and endoscopic mucosal resections (EMR) of BE. We compare a small series of biopsies of non-dysplastic BE (NDBE) from patients who progressed to more advanced disease to patients with NBDE who did not progress and then perform RNA profiling on EMRs with a range of histologic diagnoses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207