Chimeric GFP–uracil based molecular rotor fluorophores
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uracil has been modified at the 5-position to derive a small library of nucleobase-chromophores which were inspired by green fluorescent protein (GFP). The key steps in the syntheses were Erlenmeyer azlactone synthesis followed by amination by use of hexamethyl disilazane (HMDS) to produce the imidazolinone derivatives. The uracil analogues displayed emission in the green region of visible spectrum and exhibited microenvironmental sensitivity exemplified by polarity-based solvatochromism and viscosity-dependent emission enhancement. Solid-state quantum yields of approximately 0.2 and solvent dependent emission wavelengths beyond 500 nm were observed. Select analogues were incorporated into peptide nucleic acid (PNA) strands which upon duplex formation with DNA showed good response ranging from a turn-off of fluorescence in presence of an opposing mismatched residue to a greater than 3-fold turn-on of fluorescence upon binding to fully complementary DNA strand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".