MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388378419 · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2023.105125

A comparison of measles-rubella-zoster reaction, oligoclonal IgG bands, oligoclonal kappa free light chains and kappa index in multiple sclerosis

2023· article· en· W4388378419 on OpenAlexaff
Kamila Žondra Revendová, Krystof Švub, Radovan Bunganic, Ondřej Pelíšek, Ondřej Volný, Aravind Ganesh, Michal Bar, David Zeman, Pavlína Kušnierová

Bibliographic record

VenueMultiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVirology and Viral Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersMinisterstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
KeywordsMedicineKappaMultiple sclerosisMeaslesImmunoglobulin light chainRubellaVirologyImmunologyAntibodyVaccination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the measles-rubella-zoster reaction (MRZR) in a large real-world multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort. Second, to compare MRZR with the determination of oligoclonal IgG bands (OCB), oligoclonal kappa free light chain bands (oKFLC), and the KFLC index. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted at the University Hospital Ostrava (Czech Republic). Patients were eligible if aged ≥18 years with a determined clinical diagnosis. IgG antibodies against measles (M), rubella (R), and varicella zoster (Z) viruses were determined in paired CSF and serum using ELISA and MRZR indicated as positive if at least two components had an antibody index >1.4. OCB and oKFLC were detected by means of isoelectric focusing, and KFLC CSF and serum concentrations for calculation of the KFLC index were determined immunochemically. RESULTS: A total of 1,751 patients were included in the analyzed data set, which comprised 379 MS patients and 1,372 non-MS controls. The frequency of positive MRZR was higher in MS than in non-MS cases (MS 32.2 % vs non-MS 2.8 %; p < 0.001). This corresponded to a specificity of 97.2 % (95 % CI 96.1-98.0) and sensitivity of 32.2 % (95 % CI 27.5-37.2) and overall accuracy of 83.1 % (95 % CI 81.3-84.8). In comparison, the highest sensitivity of 95.6% (95 % CI 93.0-97.5) was for OCB with specificity of 86.9 % (95 % CI 84.9-88.7), followed by oKFLC with sensitivity and specificity of 94.7 % (95 % CI 91.5-96.9) and 78.4% (95 % CI 75.7-80.8), respectively, and the KFLC index with sensitivity of 92.5 % (95 % CI 86.6-96.3) and specificity of 93.5 % (95 % CI 90.5-95.9). DISCUSSION: MRZR remains a very specific test for the diagnosis of MS but has low sensitivity, which disallows its independent use. In contrast, OCB showed the highest sensitivity and thus remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of MS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMultiple Sclerosis and Related DisordersSame topicVirology and Viral DiseasesFrench-language works237,207