Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract One of the earlier important narratives written at the hand of an Ojibwe figure is shot through with references to hymn texts and their significance. Published first in 1847 and reissued in 1850 as The Life, Letters, and Speeches of Kah-Ge-Ga-Gah-Bowh, or G. Copway Chief Ojibway Nation, this text offers a glimpse of how complex was the world from which Ojibwe hymns emerged. Born far to the east of Minnesota near Rice Lake, Ontario, George Kahgegagahbowh Copway was an Ojibwe Methodist preacher who became well known on the lecture circuit and in print in the 1840s and 1850s for his vivid descriptions of the customs of his Ojibwe people and of their prospects for conversion and “civilization.” He was a prolific interpreter of his people’s culture to a nonnative audience and a vocal ad, vocate of native interests, at least as he saw those interests. Copway believed the survival and prosperity of Ojibwe people would best be served in the context of religious conversion to evangelical Christianity and cultural assimilation. But Copway was a pragmatist, not an ideologue. His verbal performances of civilization in lecture halls from Boston to Philadelphia also involved sharp criticisms of the savagery that resulted from the oppressive circumstances that faced his people under American rule. In some regards, Copway became what missionaries wanted him to become-a model of that one-directional “progress” characterized by both conversion and as, similation to Anglo-American evangelical religion and culture. But a closer look reveals a far more complicated story that led, among other things, to a falling out with the Methodists, short careers as a Union Army recruiter and a healer in Detroit, and (re,)baptism into the Roman Catholic church.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".