Performance Analysis of Zero-Forcing Precoding in Multi-Cell One-Bit Massive MIMO Downlink
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work investigates the downlink performance of a multi-cell massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system that employs one-bit analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) and digital-to-analog converters (DACs) in the receiving and transmitting radio frequency (RF) chains at each base station (BS) in order to reduce the power consumption. We utilize Bussgang decomposition to derive the minimum mean squared error (MMSE) channel estimates at each BS based on the quantized received uplink training signals, and the asymptotic closed-form expressions of the achievable downlink rates under one-bit quantized zero-forcing (ZF) precoding implemented using the estimated channels. The derived expressions explicitly show the impact of quantization noise, thermal noise, pilot contamination, and interference, and are utilized to study the number of additional antennas needed at each BS of the one-bit MIMO system to perform as well as the conventional MIMO system. Numerical results verify our analysis, and reveal that despite needing more antennas to achieve the same sum average rate, the one-bit massive MIMO system is more energy-efficient than the conventional system, especially at high sampling frequencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".