MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 12595: Vascular and Cardiac Ultrasound as the Primary Imaging Tool to Safely Deliver Pacing Leads While Implanting Single Chamber Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices. RADICAI USE Investigators

2023· article· en· W4388415750 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed T. Moustafa, Samuel Triemstra, Ahmed T. Mokhtar, Saketh Saravu, Viwe Mtwesi, Lorne J. Gula, Peter Leong‐Sit, Jaimie Manlucu, Allan C. Skanes, Raymond Yee, Anthony Tang, Habib Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound in Clinical Applications
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFluoroscopyImplantPerforationCardiac resynchronization therapyUltrasoundPneumothoraxSurgeryProspective cohort studyRadiologyCardiologyHeart failureEjection fraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Conventional Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implantation requires fluoroscopy. Risks involved with implantation include pneumothorax, lead dislodgement, and perforation of the right ventricular wall. In addition, there are long-term risks of malignancy associated with prolonged and repeated use of radiation over the decades of operators’ employment and mechanical injuries related to heavy personal protection equipment. To reduce these risks, we aimed to study the utilization and safety of ultrasound (US) for the entire procedure to implant single-chamber devices. Methods: The RADICAI USE study (Reduction or Elimination of Radiation Use in Single Chamber Cardiac Devices using ultrasound) is a prospective, single-arm and multi-operator case series enrolled patients awaiting a single-chamber CIED. A fluoroscopic cut-off time of 20 seconds was used to define the success (Group A) or failure (Group B) of using the US for the entire implant duration. Patients were followed up at 1 week, 1 month and 1-year post-implant. Results: The study enrolled 63 patients, with 50 pacemakers and 13 ICDs, a mean age of 79.5 ± 13.8 years (95% CI = 76.1 - 82.9), and a mean weight of 74.1 ± 14.6 (95% CI = 70.5 - 77.7). Overall, 53 (84.1%) CIEDs were successfully implanted with a radiation time of less than 20 seconds (Group A). Fluoroscopic over 20 seconds was required due to poor echocardiographic windows, challenging access, or anatomy. No iatrogenic new or worsening of tricuspid regurgitation was noted. The mean procedure time including US setup time was 65.2 ± 20.2 (95% CI = 60.2 -70.2) minutes. Fluoroscopic time was significantly reduced in Group A compared to Group B (5.8 ± 4.5s vs 109.5 ± 92.9s, p = 0.004). Follow-up showed no device-related complications, with only two patients requiring lead revisions due to poor sensitivity, one unrelated to US use and another probably related. Conclusions: US-guided implantation of single-chamber CIEDs is feasible and safe, reducing the need for fluoroscopic guided implantation and subsequent risks of higher radiation exposure. Further studies are required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and to explore fluoroscopic-free single-chamber CIED implantations using the US.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207