MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388417644 · doi:10.1177/08850666231210485

Impact of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and FiO <sub>2</sub> on Lung Mechanics and Intrapulmonary Shunt in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with ARDS Due to COVID-19 Pneumonia

2023· article· en· W4388417644 on OpenAlexaff
Gaetano Florio, Alberto Zanella, Douglas Slobod, Amedeo Guzzardella, Ilaria Protti, Eleonora Carlesso, Arif Canakoglu, Jacopo Fumagalli, Vittorio Scaravilli, Sebastiano Maria Colombo, Alessio Caccioppola, Matteo Brioni, Antonio M. Pesenti, Giacomo Grasselli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intensive Care Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePositive end-expiratory pressureARDSShunt (medical)AnesthesiaMechanical ventilationPulmonary compliancePulmonary shuntLungHemodynamicsCardiac outputCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effects of inspired oxygen fraction (FiO 2 ) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on gas exchange in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Methods: Two FiO 2 (100%, 40%) were tested at 3 decreasing levels of PEEP (15, 10, and 5 cmH 2 O). At each FiO 2 and PEEP, gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and the distribution of ventilation and perfusion were assessed with electrical impedance tomography. The impact of FiO 2 on the intrapulmonary shunt (delta shunt) was analyzed as the difference between the calculated shunt at FiO 2 100% (shunt) and venous admixture at FiO 2 40% (venous admixture). Results: Fourteen patients were studied. Decreasing PEEP from 15 to 10 cmH 2 O did not change shunt (24 [21-28] vs 27 [24-29]%) or venous admixture (18 [15-26] vs 23 [18-34]%) while partial pressure of arterial oxygen (FiO 2 100%) was higher at PEEP 15 (262 [198-338] vs 256 [147-315] mmHg; P &lt; .05). Instead when PEEP was decreased from 10 to 5 cmH 2 O, shunt increased to 36 [30-39]% ( P &lt; .05) and venous admixture increased to 33 [30-43]% ( P &lt; .05) and partial pressure of arterial oxygen (100%) decreased to 109 [76-177] mmHg ( P &lt; .05). At PEEP 15, administration of 100% FiO 2 resulted in a shunt greater than venous admixture at 40% FiO 2, ((24 [21-28] vs 18 [15-26]%, P = .005), delta shunt 5.5% (2.3-8.8)). Compared to PEEP 10, PEEP of 5 and 15 cmH 2 O resulted in decreased global and pixel-level compliance. Cardiac output at FiO 2 100% resulted higher at PEEP 5 (5.4 [4.4-6.5]) compared to PEEP 10 (4.8 [4.1-5.5], P &lt; .05) and PEEP 15 cmH 2 O (4.7 [4.5-5.4], P &lt; .05). Conclusion: In this study, PEEP of 15 cmH 2 O, despite resulting in the highest oxygenation, was associated with overdistension. PEEP of 5 cmH 2 O was associated with increased shunt and alveolar collapse. Administration of 100% FiO 2 was associated with an increase in intrapulmonary shunt in the setting of high PEEP. Trial registration: NCT05132933.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.826

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Intensive Care MedicineSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207