MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 12542: Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl on First and Total Cardiovascular Events in the Metabolic Syndrome: REDUCE-IT MetSyn

2023· article· en· W4388419480 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Miller, Deepak L. Bhatt, Eliot A. Brinton, Terry A. Jacobson, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Armando Lira Pineda, Steven Ketchum, Ralph T. Doyle, Jean‐Claude Tardif, Christie M. Ballantyne

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionClinical endpointUnstable anginaStroke (engine)CardiologyPlaceboNumber needed to treatMetabolic syndromeAcute coronary syndromeRelative riskRandomized controlled trialConfidence intervalObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The Metabolic Syndrome (MetSyn) is associated with persistently high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events despite statin treatment. Methods: REDUCE-IT was a multinational, double-blind trial that randomized 8179 high CV risk statin-treated patients with controlled low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and elevated triglycerides, to icosapent ethyl (IPE) 4 grams/day or placebo. In the overall trial, IPE reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint (CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization or hospitalization for unstable angina) and the key secondary composite endpoint (CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke). Here we examine the prespecified patient subgroup with a history of MetSyn, but without diabetes at baseline. Results: Compared with placebo, IPE use in patients with MetSyn at baseline (n=2866) was associated with a 29% relative risk reduction for the primary composite endpoint (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.59-0.84]; P <0.0001, absolute risk reduction [ARR]=5.9%; number needed to treat [NNT]=17) and 41% reduction in total (first plus subsequent) events (rate ratio [RR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.48-0.72]; P <0.0001) (Figure 1). The risk for the key secondary composite endpoint was reduced by 20% (P=0.05) with a 27% reduction in fatal/nonfatal MI (P=0.03), 47% reduction in urgent/emergent revascularization (P <0.0001) and 58% reduction in hospitalization for unstable angina (P <0.0001). Non-statistically significant reductions were observed in fatal/nonfatal stroke (27%), cardiac arrest (44%) and sudden cardiac death (34%). Conclusions: In statin-treated patients, the addition of IPE significantly reduced the risk of first and total CV events in REDUCE-IT patients with a history of MetSyn. The large relative and absolute risk reductions observed support IPE as a therapeutic consideration for high CV risk patients with MetSyn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health→French-language works237,207→