Political realities and subjugation of minority community in Rohinton Mistry’s “such a long journey”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
writer from the Indian diaspora who now resides in Canada, writes with a keen awareness of all forms of exploitation of society's Minority Community. He writes about the common people and their struggles in the midst of social, political, economic, and personal turbulence. This piece of writing tries to highlight the political realities and subjugation of Minority Community in Rohinton Mistry's well-known book "Such a Long Journey". It takes into account the fact that a lot of contemporary Indian English novels focus on the historical description of the dominance of Minority Community. This paper would look at how Rohinton Mistry's well-known book Such a Long Journey reproduces the methods used to portray a significant period in the history of India through the depiction of political situations of that particular time and then look at how Mistry addresses topics like inequality and struggle of Minority Community in general and Parsi Community in particular. Like all other Parsi writers, Mistry is also an integral part of the community who expresses the worries of his community facing a dominant culture. By highlighting the political issues, he exposes all hegemonic tactics used by the majority people. People in the novel Such a Long Journey are no longer unaware of the betrayals being imposed on them; they feel betrayed by the political leaders and are no longer willing to believe in political discourse and the pitiful speeches of these politicians. Instead, a drama of deceit and fraud is being played in the name of political unity and a strong government.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".