MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388429470 · doi:10.54922/ijehss.2023.0599

FACTORS AFFECTING DISCIPLINE AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF GRADE I PUPILS IN BOBULON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SAN FELIPE, ZAMBALES

2023· article· en· W4388429470 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josie D Olanda

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Education Humanities and Social Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAffect (linguistics)Quarter (Canadian coin)PsychologyMathematics educationSchool disciplineDisciplinePedagogySociologySocial scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study aimed to determine the factors affecting discipline and academic performance of the 49 Grade I pupils in Bobulon Elementary School, San Felipe, Zambales geared towards developing discipline. The researcher made use of descriptive correlation method. Majority of the respondents were males belonging to age six (6) years old with one (1) to two (2) siblings and within the P4,999 and below bracket of monthly family income. Most of them perceived that school factor and teacher factor always affect discipline, home factor oftentimes affect discipline, environmental factor sometimes affect discipline, and technology factor seldom affect discipline. The academic performance of the respondents for first quarter was satisfactory and very satisfactory for second quarter. Hence, there are factors that affect discipline and academic performance of the pupils that have led them to instill discipline to improve their academic performance. The study recommends that parents must find jobs or income generating activities for additional budget of the family. Parents must be aware that the environment of the pupils, regardless of their gender will be contributory factors in the formation and establishment of their discipline. Parents must attend community assemblies to air their concerns to assure that their children will have a good environmental foundation. The proposed action plan in discipline must be implemented to improve the academic performance of the pupils

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Education Humanities and Social ScienceSame topicEducational Methods and Media UseFrench-language works237,207