MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388430537 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2023.3328807

MMSE Equalizer Design Optimization for Wireline SerDes Applications

2023· article· en· W4388430537 on OpenAlexafffund
Alireza Akbarpour Bazargani, Hossein Shakiba, D.A. Johns

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsJitterWirelineComputer scienceNoise (video)Sampling (signal processing)Control theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringFilter (signal processing)EngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents analytical equations for optimizing feedforward equalizer (FFE) and decision feedback equalizer (DFE) parameters in a wireline receiver to speed up system-level design and simulations. A minimum mean square error (MMSE)-based approach is applied to the receiver model, and a set of equations is developed to co-optimize FFE and DFE taps. The equations consider the noise sources in wireline links, including the sampling clock jitter. It also considers the effect of the noise correlations on the equalizer parameters. For sampling clock jitter, two separate models are developed to distinguish between sampling for discrete-time and continuous-time FFEs (pre-and post-FFE sampling). Then, the translation of jitter noise to voltage noise is carefully investigated. Jitter noise can be either white or correlated. Later, the developed model is modified to generate different variants of MMSE-based approaches to be used in various practical scenarios a designer may face. This includes the equalizer design for maximum likelihood sequence estimation (MLSE)-based receivers and equalizer design with bounded DFE tap magnitude to control undesired side effects such as error propagation. Finally, the use of “tap skipping” to save FFE hardware resources is investigated. The accuracy of models and the performance of each method is justified through simulations and comparing against the LMS adaptation loops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207