Digital Twin Model Selection for Feature Accuracy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Digital twins (DTs) can be used to represent the behavior of real physical systems (PSs) in their interaction with other objects. Each DT periodically communicates with its PS and uses these updates to implement features that reflect the real behavior of the PS. A given feature can be implemented using different models that create the feature with differing levels of system accuracy. In this article, we study the DT model selection problem, where the DTs of multiple PSs are hosted at an execution server (ES). The objective is to maximize the minimum feature accuracy for the requested features by making appropriate model selections subject to the synchronization and ES execution constraints. The model selection problem is first formulated as an NP-complete integer program. It is then decomposed into multiple subproblems, each consisting of a modified Knapsack problem. A polynomial-time approximation algorithm is proposed using dynamic programming to solve it efficiently, by violating its constraints by at most a given factor. A generalization of the model selection problem is then given and an approximation algorithm using relaxation and dependent rounding is proposed to solve the problem efficiently with guaranteed constraint violations. A variety of simulation results are presented that demonstrate the excellent performance of the proposed solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".