MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388430578 · doi:10.1109/twc.2023.3328496

Channel Estimation for Dynamic Metasurface Antennas

2023· article· en· W4388430578 on OpenAlexafffund
Maryam Rezvani, Raviraj Adve

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)MIMOWirelessMinimum mean square errorThroughputControl channelAlgorithmBase stationElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To meet the rising demand for data rates, the next generation of wireless communication will need to deploy more antennas at the base stations (BSs) while also addressing sustainability and power efficiency concerns. Recently, metasurfaces, specifically dynamic metasurface antennas (DMAs), have been suggested as potential solutions. Specifically, researchers have demonstrated the potential throughput performance of DMAs as basestation antennas. In this paper, we study the channel estimation problem for DMAs, modeled as correlated multiple input multiple output (MIMO) systems. We first propose a system model that details the noise sources in these systems. Then, exploiting the fast response time of DMAs, we consider the possibility of multiple channel measurements during a single symbol. Adopting a minimum-mean-square-error (MMSE) based approach and assuming availability of the long-term channel correlation matrices at the receiver and transmitters, then, we formulate the channel estimation problem. We first solve this problem assuming full-control over the DMA. We then propose a more practical algorithm to map the full-control solution to the DMA structure, thereby accounting for the limitations imposed by the DMA. Our numerical results demonstrate that the proposed practical algorithm suffers only a minor performance loss compared to the full-control case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207