Robin Sequence Facial Profile After Conservative Treatment: A Long-Term Follow-Up
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Robin sequence (RS) is a congenital clinical condition characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, and respiratory distress. Conservative methods could be responsible for releasing feeding and respiratory impairment but little information about mandibular growth is known in long-term follow-up. OBJECTIVE: Assessing the longitudinal behavior of the facial profile of individuals with isolated RS who underwent conservative micrognathia treatment using photographs during the whole craniofacial growth. METHODS: Photographs of the right facial profile of 100 patients were used (50 individuals with isolated RS and 50 individuals without craniofacial anomaly). The individuals with RS were evaluated at 3 different times (T1: infant, T2: mixed dentition, T3: permanent dentition) by measuring the facial convexity angle (FCA; G.Sn.Pog´). A comparison between T3 and control group (C), individuals without craniofacial anomalies and in permanent dentition, was also performed, checking the FCA, nasolabial angle (Ls.Sn.Cm), mentolabial fold (Li.Si.Pog´), facial inferior third (Sn.Gn´.C) angles and the ratio between middle anterior facial height and lower anterior facial height. RESULTS: The T3 group showed an increased angle of facial convexity and increased facial inferior third angle and middle anterior facial height/lower anterior facial height ratio compared with the control group. In the longitudinal evaluation of individuals with isolated RS, significant differences were identified between T1 and T2 groups and T1 and T3 groups showing that the increased facial convexity was higher in the infants and that did not change significantly between the phases of mixed and permanent dentition. CONCLUSIONS: RS showed increased facial convexity in all phases evaluated, but their convexity decreased with growth. When compared with individuals without craniofacial anomalies, the individuals continue to exhibit retrognathism in the permanent dentition. The lack of a mandible projection has led to a considerable number of orthognathic surgeries for the correction of discrepancies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".