MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Neural Implicit Representation for Three-dimensional Ultrasound Carotid Surface Reconstruction using Unsigned Distance Function

2023· article· en· W4388450246 on OpenAlexafffund
Hongbo Chen, Logiraj Kumaralingam, Jiawen Li, Kumaradevan Punithakumar, Lawrence H. Le, Rui Zheng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Innovates
KeywordsHausdorff distanceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionSigned distance functionNoise (video)VoxelComputer scienceIterative reconstructionMarching cubesArtificial neural networkBoundary (topology)Surface (topology)UltrasoundVisualizationPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsImage (mathematics)GeometryAcousticsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate 3D geometric shapes of carotid arteries are imperative for the three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) imaging to clinically assess the carotid atherosclerosis (CA). However, the traditional surface reconstruction method, such as iso-surface (ISO-SURF), suffers from the image noise, voxel resolution and additional processing. In this paper, we introduce the neural implicit representation based on the deep learning network for the 3D surface reconstruction of media-adventitia boundary (MAB), plaque, and lumen-intima boundary (LIB) together. The unsigned distance functions are learned by the network to generate the mesh. For the validation, six volumes were simulated in carotid shape with MAB and LIB, and random noise was added around the boundaries. The results showed that experiments on six simulated volumes illustrated better performance than ISO-SURF, with 47%, 36%, and 55% decrease in Chamfer distance, average absolute distance, and Hausdorff distance, respectively. The visualization results from the CA clinical data revealed a smoother and more continuous geometric surface than ISO-SURF. The comparison result has shown the potential of the proposed method to examine vascular pathologies in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→