Internal tremor in people with Parkinson’s Disease: Demographic characteristics and comorbid symptoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Internal tremor (IT) occurs in > 30 % of people with Parkinson's Disease (PwPD), but remains largely uninvestigated. Our objective was to describe demographic characteristics and associated symptoms in PwPD who reported IT. Methods: This was a matched case-control survey study. Data were from PwPD in the Fox Insight study who answered the Patient Report of Problems (PD-PROP) assessment, a series of open-ended questions that asks people to report in their own words their most bothersome PD-related problems. Cases were those who reported IT ≥ 1 times compared with PwPD controls who did not report IT and were matched 1:3 by age and disease duration. Results: 243 PwPD reported IT as a bothersome problem. Mean (SD) age of cases was 64.9 (9.4) years and disease duration was 3.8 (4.0) years. The proportion of women was greater among cases compared to controls (74 % vs 47 %, p < 0.0001). External tremor as a PD-PROP symptom was reported by 98 % cases and 48 % controls (p < 0.0001). Several non-motor symptoms were more common among cases than controls, including anxiety (35 % vs 20 %), fatigue (41 % vs 31 %), and pain (57 % vs 37 %). The odds of IT was significantly higher in women when adjusting for anxiety and motor experiences of daily living score (OR 3.07, 95 %CI 2.14-4.41, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: PwPD with IT report a range of associated symptoms, including external tremor, anxiety, and pain. Sex differences in the experience of IT may exist. Studies of IT are needed to understand its etiology and inform clinical care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".