MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Development and Testing of an Angled, High Frequency Ultrasound Probe for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeries

2023· article· en· W4388450672 on OpenAlexaff
Theresa Gu, Nicole MacMullin, Thomas Landry, Sean Christie, Jeremy Brown

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersHealth Research
KeywordsUltrasoundBiomedical engineeringSpinal cordHigh frequency ultrasoundMaterials scienceMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As spine surgeries for decompression of the spinal cord and nerve roots trend towards minimally invasive approaches, conventional visualization methods for surgical guidance, such as ultrasound, are often ineffective. This is because conventional imaging probes are too large to fit down the limited access routes used in these approaches. We have developed a miniature high-resolution ultrasound phased array specifically for this application. The probe has a cross section of 4 mm by 4 mm, length of 16 cm from the handle, and an angled tip that enables imaging at a 40-degree angle from forward looking. The image window was steered between +/-32 degrees with an imaging depth of 15 mm. The array was micromachined using a picosecond laser, had 64 sub-diced elements, and an operating frequency of 30 MHz. The axial and lateral resolution were measured to be 33 μm and 116 μm, respectively, and the secondary lobes were suppressed to -60 dB. During preliminary clinical studies, patients were imaged during minimally invasive spine surgery, where the spinal cord anatomy and compression points could clearly be visualized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology→French-language works237,207→