Analysis of Carbon Markets of CO2 Storage Projects in Oil and Gas Fields in Canada and the United States
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study analyzes carbon markets in the U.S. and Canada, including enhanced oil/gas recovery (EOR/EGR) projects. The American Carbon Registry (ACR), a voluntary carbon market in California, and the Canadian Alberta Emission Offset System have methodologies for EOR and storage in saline aquifers. ACR also presented EGR. EOR-CCS projects demonstrated significant CO2 reductions, ranging from 1,748 to 7,675 million tons in the U.S. and 30 to 3,040 million tons in Canada. The EOR and hydrogen-production-linked CCS projects are representative CCS projects in Canada. CCS infrastructure construction, R&D, and demonstration projects of oil/natural gas-CCS-hydrogen are actively underway in the net-zero policies by the U.S. and Canada. CCS projects in the U.S. and Canada, which are linked to the supply of natural gas and hydrogen energy in Korea, can secure new overseas energy sources and dispose of the CO2 captured in Korea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it