MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388461133 · doi:10.18280/isi.280510

Remote-Controlled Bluetooth-Enabled Smart Shopping Cart: Prototype and Evaluation

2023· article· en· W4388461133 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ritzkal Ritzkal, Bayu Adhi Prakosa, Indri Puji Astuti Munandar, Puspa Amalia, Ade Hendri Hendrawan, Nurul Kamilah

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCartBluetoothComputer scienceEmbedded systemHuman–computer interactionReal-time computingTelecommunicationsEngineeringWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an endeavor to enhance consumer experience and streamline the shopping process, this study presents the design and evaluation of a smart shopping cart prototype, devised to replace conventional manual shopping carts.Customers traditionally utilize baskets to transport purchased goods to the cashier for payment processing.During peak shopping hours, queues often form, potentially detracting from the customer's overall shopping experience.Customers are typically obliged to stand adjacent to their baskets to maintain their position in the queue, a practice this innovation intends to eliminate.The proposed smart shopping cart employs Bluetooth HC-05 technology to facilitate remote operation, thereby enabling users to wait at a comfortable distance from their groceries.The remote control for the cart is designed to interface with Android smartphones, capitalizing on the ubiquity of these devices in customers' daily lives.The ease of connecting Bluetooth HC-05 with an Android device further simplifies the operation for users well-versed with smartphones.This study outlines the construction and testing of a smart shopping cart prototype, although it has not been directly implemented in a supermarket setting.The conducted tests are representative of the performance of a potential full-scale model.The remote control application, tailored to the specific commands required by the shopping cart, was developed using Kodular.It can be easily accessed and downloaded from the Kodular website.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207