MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388464708 · doi:10.1137/21m1420733

Hysteresis and Stability

2023· article· en· W4388464708 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Amenda Chow, Kirsten Morris, Gina Faraj Rabbah

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHysteresisComplement (music)Ordinary differential equationStability (learning theory)Dynamical systems theoryPerspective (graphical)GraphComputer scienceDifferential (mechanical device)Applied mathematicsDifferential equationMathematicsStatistical physicsTheoretical computer scienceMathematical analysisPhysicsThermodynamicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A common definition of hysteresis is that the graph of the state of the system displays looping behavior as the input of the system varies. Alternatively, a dynamical systems perspective can be used to define hysteresis as a phenomenon arising from multiple equilibrium points. Consequently, hysteresis is a topic that can be used to illustrate and extend concepts in a dynamical systems course. The concept is illustrated in this paper through examples of ordinary differential equations, most motivated by applications. Simulations are presented to complement the analysis. The examples can be used to construct student exercises, and specific additional questions are listed in an appendix. The paper concludes with a discussion of possible extensions, including hysteresis in partial differential equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM ReviewSame topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207