Turbulence-induced electrical discharges in charged particle-laden Martian boundary layers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Martian dust storms in the planetary boundary layer share many qualitative similarities to terrestrial sandstorms. Both of these turbulence-driven, particle-laden boundary layer flows are known to generate electric fields due to the transport of differentially charged particles; this charge separation can be strong enough to lead to dielectric breakdown in the form of sparks or lightning. Using wall-modelled large-eddy simulations supplemented with conservation of equations for the charged particle transport, representative simulations of neutrally stable Martian and terrestrial particle-laden boundary layer flows are compared. The simulations, albeit canonical in nature, provide evidence to support previous observations of the less frequent occurrence of lightning on Mars but a higher occurrence of localised electric discharge events due to the much lower breakdown potential. The rarefied Martian atmosphere impedes charged particle transport, resulting in a weaker electric field than the equivalent terrestrial sandstorm. The lower drag force in the rarefied Martian atmosphere means that the electrostatic force plays a more significant role in the particle transport, which results in a self-regulation of the electric field. The strongest Martian dust storms show evidence of significant breakdown events and these discharge events only occur very close to the ground despite the very large boundary layer on Mars.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".